Los Angeles Times Coverage of Hwang Indictments Misses Points of Relevance to Proposition 71

In a May 12 article in the Los Angeles Times, BarbaraSun Jong. This is not to say that Hwang did not
Demick began her story about the indictment ofcommit fraud. He did. However, the Hwang saga
Hwang Woo-Suk and five associates with the text:illustrates how research pressures can cause bad
South Korean prosecutors announced today thatacts, both as to a junior researcher (Kim Sun Jong)
they had charged scientist Hwang Woo-suk withand to a team leader (Hwang Woo Suk). Although
embezzlement and fraud, saying he misused publicthe May 12 Times article states that Hwang is now
funds for his fabricated experiments in human cloning."despised as a charlatan," the current situation,
The article is interesting for what it didn't sayespecially in South Korea, is more complex. Hwang
concerning two areas that might be of relevance towrote many articles which were accurate, and just
people interested in how Proposition 71 is going toas he was the perpetrator of fraud, he was also a
play out in California: the egg donation issue and thevictim of fraud. And, just as people in California want
multiple fraud issue.to believe in the end result of stem cell research, so
Of egg procurement, the Times article did notdo people in South Korea.
mention that Hwang Woo-Suk was also indicted forThe story of Kim Sun Jong illustrates another point
violating the Korean law on bioethics, adopted inof relevance to Proposition 71. One of the selling
January 2005. He paid money to women to obtainpoints for state funding of stem cell research, in the
eggs for his research.presence of limitations in federal funding created by
In December 2005, a U.S. stem cell researcher inPresident Bush in 2001, was to forestall a loss of
commenting on what he saw as hyperventilationresearch presence from the United States to other
about the egg donation problem in Hwang's lab, that,countries. If there were no funding in the U.S., all of
"Now that [Hwang] has done his public mea culpa Ithe U.S. stars of stem cell research would pack up
say the time is to forgive him and let him get backand go to foreign countries more favorably disposed
to plying his considerable craft." The same researcherto stem cell research, and the U.S. would lose its
also wrote: We pay women to donate eggs foredge in this area of potential high impact. The story
infertility treatment, and on the whole the practiceof Kim Sun Jong is a counterpoint to this thinking.
has been done reasonably well. Donation for ESCWorking on a team perceived to be the world
research is as important. As long as full information,leaders in stem cell research, Kim Sun Jong, according
coverage, etc. are there, there is no reason per seto Korean prosecutors, falsified research results to
why some financial compensation is not provided.obtain exchange fellowships in the U.S. He succeeded
South Korea had adopted a strong legal frameworkin getting to the U.S., specifically to the lab of Gerald
concerning the procurement of human eggs. It wasSchatten at the University of Pittsburgh, who has
violated almost immediately, and now we have anobtained the most federal support for stem cell
indictment. Although the Los Angeles Times hadresearch. Ironically, in following up on leads of fraud
written on April 27: [CIRM] also has adopteddone by Hwang, producers for Korean MBC-TV
top-notch standards for research ethics and theinterviewed Kim Sun Jong in Pittsburgh on October
protection of potential egg donors, one notes that it20, 2005, and, quite prophetically for that time, told
takes more than standards to see that people areKim that both Science papers by Hwang would be
protected. Embryonic stem cell research requiresretracted.
human eggs, and the pressure for researchers toIn summary, in failing to mention the egg
obtain them is immense. Although it was widelyprocurement issue and the multiple fraud issue, the
rumored that Hwang Woo-Suk pressuredMay 12 article in the Los Angeles Times lost the
subordinates into donating eggs for his 2004 paper inopportunity to illuminate two issues of high impact in
Science, and later that he paid for eggs, little actionthe implementation of Proposition 71. Eggs will be
was taken at the time.needed to carry out embryonic stem cell research,
The theme of pressure is present in the multipleand the potential for abuse, and disregard of that
fraud issue in the Hwang matter. Although the Mayabuse, in obtaining eggs is a major, foreseeable,
12 Times article wrote "prosecutors said Hwang andproblem. Because the abuse in Korea occurred in the
an aide fabricated the data in two landmark papers,"face of strong laws, the assertion that CIRM has
the situation is a bit more complicated. Theadopted strong standards as to egg donation is not
prosecutors confirmed Hwang's initial claims that onethe final answer to this issue. Pressure on researchers
of his junior researchers, Kim Sun Jong, falsifiedto obtain significant results can lead to fraud. The
results of the 2004 and 2005 studies and that HwangHwang matter involved independent frauds by at
was initially unaware of this falsification. This was notleast two researchers, and does not fit neatly into
a one-person fraud, or a concerted two-person fraud.the "one bad apple" box.
Hwang was actually tricked by his subordinate Kim